As part of a recent application, I included a research project that I want to undertake which I am calling Collaboratory. Here’s a little more about it:

Collaboratory will initiate discussions on public and private spaces and experiment with collective remediation. Collaboratory, will occur as a series of conversations (many of which will be public) between designers, artists, architects, scientists, planners and the general public and me. Collaboratory is the investigative aspect of the Seeding the City project. Building upon the experimentation in bridging the private/public divide in collective remediation, these conversations will provide research and inspiration. By also creating publicly accessible records of these conversations, the information can spur other projects. I will investigate modular and shared green walls across buildings and spaces, shared rainwater collection, transient solar power, sharecropping and other potential reuse of our urban space as sustainable shared experiences, as embodied in public art/interactive projects. From these conversations I will begin to develop experimental project sketches and concepts for future projects.

I am interested in using art as a dispersal method for investigations in the use of urban infrastructure as a remediation tool. The available resources to engage in environmental remediation are mostly costly, complicated or highly technical. My theory is that if the tools were made simple and accessible – hydroponics in a box (or Window Farms), Ikea solar panels – there would be widespread adoption. Our preconceptions about private space will be challenged through these experimentations as we learn how our spaces can generate positive impact.

Let’s hope I get the funding to pursue it!

In the laboratory, originally uploaded by Manic Street Preacher.

last night, i was working on my presentation for the talk that I am getting ready to give at the Graduate School of Design at Harvard. The talk is using HighWaterLine as a jumping off point for discussing the role that artists and designers can play in the larger scheme of environmental policy and planning. During my preparations, I posted the following on Twitter and Facebook: “Eve is once again thinking about the role that artists can play in social change – what do we bring to the table and how is that unique?”

I got some fascinating responses which I would like to share:

Abigail Ramos at 10:19pm March 9
artists are our most valuable historians… they document the times from the perspective of the people and in a much more meaningful way than words ever could. ok, i think i’m way off from your question though. i dunno. ;p

Jeremiah Moore at 11:23pm March 9 via Facebook Mobile
among other things, artists are digesting and remixing symbols… & bringing new structures… these create new cultural and personal pathways, paving the way for social change.

Lizzie Scott at 11:55am March 10
Artists (sometimes) expand what we consider to be possible, and (one hopes) allow us to expand our thinking in general. Without revolutions in our ideas, we get totally stuck with “that’s just the way things are.”

Marc Mitzner at 3:12pm March 10
Artists challenge the “norm” – what is socially acceptable & what isn’t – as well as point out the folly in what IS the norm.

Anyway, just a reason to love it…

I have a question for you-

Do you love what you are doing?

I mean really really enjoy (practically) every minute of it? Do you, at the end of each day think, I did good, and I love what I did today?

If you don’t why not? Or more importantly, why are you not doing what you love?

I have had a couple of conversations with people who are anxiously attempting to create something that sells, or something that they perceive as marketable. And I have to wonder if they will A) ever find success with that and B) ever be happy doing it?

Don’t you think – particularly in art making – the passion comes across and makes the work stronger?

And maybe passion/love isn’t always the right term. I think for many the word may be “fun” or “interesting.” Even with that, at the end of the day, you might say “that was cool – i really had fun today and I made some great work!”

If you aren’t getting a buzz from your own work, how will anyone else? If your work doesn’t excite you in some way, maybe you should think about finding what does.

I tell you all this because too many people spend their time searching for the right product for their perceived audience. Why not create a product (work) that you love and find an audience for that. I think that is a lot more interesting and, in fact, easier! (There is a lot less guess work in the second option).

I have a friend who talks about the power of working to your mission (your passion) as opposed to towards “the sale.” When you work towards your mission, everything else (money, recognition, etc) will follow.

So think about it, Do you love what you are doing?

As some of you may know, I have been working on the curriculum development for a new workshop on artists’ using the internet to build community, create work and promote themselves. My own personal interest has really been in the social networking realm – I found the potential of the exponential audience presented by Facebook (here’s me) pretty astounding. This interest led to me wanting to know more about other services and I leapt into Twitter (me again) and soon thereafter Plurk (and, me again).

I will be honest, it can all be pretty overwhelming, but here’s what I am *just beginning* to figure out.

First, that idea of the exponential audience. What’s really cool about facebook (other than the ability to post blog posts, events, images etc of your work) is that if you post something like an event, and a friend of mine decides to attend – that attendance and the information about the event, is posted to all of her friends. Here’s a non-art example. I  posted to my “wall” (a place to leave notes) a note about a fundraiser for the rescue where we got our dog. I included a really cute picture of my dog. All of my 100+ friends on Facebook saw that posting. One of my friends was interested in the post and posted it on her own wall. Now all of her 100+ friends (of which we only share about 10) saw the posting too. So over 200 people now have access to the information and can act on it.

A similar thing occurs when I make “pages” for my different art projects. When I make the page, my friends see that I have done so, then they can become a “fan” of the page/project. When they become a fan they will recieve updates/events/images that I post which are specific to that project. Also, when they become a fan, their friends will see that and can become fans as well. And, should you chose, the page can be made available to the public. So I have 3 different project pages (HighWaterLine, Insert ____ Here and Seeding the City) on which there are a number of “fans” who are not necessarily “friends” of mine.

Is this making sense? I hope so. Its a little like free word of mouth advertising. There is a certain advanced level of trust that occurs on Facebook, as you chose who your friends are, and therefore anything they are attending is probably of more interest to you – sort of pre-screened in a way.

Starting to sound pretty good? Let’s jump into the idea of these strangely titled things like Twitter & Plurk. These two sites are what are called “microblogs” or sometimes “lifeblogs.” They limit each posting to only 140 characters.  My last 24 hours on Twitter look something like this…

The difference between Twitter & Plurk (other than the interface – Twitters is simpler) is that Plurk allows for more conversation between users, as opposed to the sort of shouts or blips of information on Twitter. What I have figured out to do is to set Ping.fm which provides a way to post to both of them simultaneously (thanks again maplemama!). I already have Facebook set up to update my “updates” via Twitter.

So why bother? Well, Facebook’s exponential power makes it quite obvious, but the micro-blogs are more complicated to understand, and that’s what I am working out right now. I know a couple of my friends primarily use the services to keep in touch with close friends and family – its a pretty nice way to update people on what you are up to moment by moment. (I joke with my friends and family that they really need to join one of the services so they can know what I am actually doing – but that would in fact be the best way to keep up).

They are definitely useful for promoting your blog or site (I announce every new post) and have gotten a couple of referrals to the sites from Twitter (twice as many from Facebook), and I just started Plurk yesterday, so I will let you know after I post this blog. They are also useful for learning things, I just read a great blog post, Social Media – Should You Use it Or Focus Upon Building Your Own Properties? by ProBlogger, who I follow. The best method of using these types of services is to take the time to find your community in the masses and really try to grow and nurture that community. As with any friendship, you can’t just blast in there, announce your blog and expect everyone to come running, there has to be more give and take (just like in real life!) and more engagement with other people. Which can be quite fascinating, I have, over the years met many wonderful people via the web (many of which I do end up meeting in person and many of whom I have been able to maintain a long term friendship). Once you build up that community, you will reap the rewards.

So the difficulty becomes finding a balance between your studio practice, your blogging or website maintenance, participating in social networks and participating in in person networking. There is no doubt that as an artist networking is extremely important. As is paying attention to the business side of your art (including promoting, finances and planning). With all these demands, is there balance? I think there can be, I think focus and time management – both offline and online is really important. I don’t let myself just go wandering around the social networks. I follow the conversations and posts which are of most interest to me, and leaving the rest by the wayside. I also take the time to comment on a worthwhile post (or as you may have noticed lately – bookmarking it to share [trying to figure out the best method for making these weekly posts instead of daily]). That commenting is all part of the social give and take.

There are a lot of posts out there about why and how to act online, why blogging is worthwhile etc., so I don’t need to restate a lot of it:

A post on “catchers” and “throwers” on the web, and how to be courteous as either

1,000 True Fans

The importance of social media marketing

Cory Doctorow on why an artist’s biggest enemy is obscurity, not piracy

The amazing compilation of “Blogging for Artists” put together by Katherine Tyrell

That should keep you busy for a little while, but remember Stay Focused!

I have been working with a couple of friends on updating/creating their websites. At the same time I have been working on creating curriculum around artists using the web (I am most interested in social media, my facebook: http://www.facebook.com/people/Eve_S_Mosher/812474238 and my twitter: http://twitter.com/e_mo) and sitting on a panel for a CUE/NYFA workshop for artist’s websites. Lots and lots of internet-y stuff.

So to get my friends started on their sites, I asked them a set of questions to consider:

Some to-do’s (if you haven’t already done them):
1. Write down your 1-2 year goals for your artistic practice career. Be very specific about what you plan to accomplish.
2. Think about how your website can help you achieve those goals (keeping in mind the highly interactive nature of the web these days).
3. Write the “mission” of your website. What do you want your website to do to advance your career and meet your goals. (We may not be able to achieve it right away, but we can get the structure in place for further growth).
4. Determine if you are interested in having a site that is more than a “portfolio” site – do you want some interactivity with a larger community/audience, do you want a form of e-commerce, do you want a blog that allows you to show your personality?
5. Given that maintaining a website should be a regular part of your practice, how often do you perceive updating or adding content to the site?
6. What kind of content do you want on the site (photos, videos, hi-res images [for press], downloadable docs, text pages, etc.) – start to think about the hierarchy.

I also sent another friend a list of resources:

• http://www.osalt.com/ -open source (FREE!) application clones (photoshop, dreamweaver, etc.)
• http://gallery.menalto.com/ – I think, simply the best open source application for managing a portfolio. It is what I used to build my site. Thousands of themes available, some of which can be viewed here: http://themes.gallery2.hu/
• http://themes.wordpress.net/ – I love wordpress (you can tell) and there are some great themes out there that you can build upon (more here: http://www.wpthemesfree.com/)

Most of all, have fun with it all!